where the 'teh' is the 'the'
2020 / July / 18
(go to main page)
is still the main topic this week. We are now several
months into the 'pandemic' (that never was). It was
supposed to be a killer virus. We were all going to die.
However, not much happened. Elderly people died. And while
that is regrettable (every death is a tragedy), we must
live with the fact that there is still no cure for life.
Optimistically, and to make the calculation easy --
Earthling News is not ashamed of being lazy -- a person
lives 100 years. That means 1% of the population dies
every year. So far, in all countries this number is within
rather normal ranges.
That means that something went seriously wrong. We wrecked
the entire economy. And economy is what is keeping people
alive; wrecking it will cause many collateral deaths.
Preventable deaths, there where deaths from flu-like
diseases are not so easily prevented. One can more or less
say that every two million euros of economy is equivalent
to one life. The GDP of Europe is 23 trillion. It dropped
about 10%, so that is 2.3 trillion euros. That is, about a
million people will die somewhere in the world because of
the lockdown measures in Europe.
About 200 thousand people died in Europe (allegedly) of
CoFlu19, we can see that the economical effect overshadow
the effects of teh virus. And the flu deaths are not
preventable. This should give you some food for thought.
CoFlu19 statistics about
This week the oped is about the reason how can it be that
we blundered our way into this madness?
The reason might be the structure of our society. We have
created a perfect technocracy! It is a society that is
ultra-bureaucratic, where nobody is responsible for
anything anymore. All decisions are made by institutes
instead of people. And these institutes are populated by
non-elected officials, 'experts'. (But experts that
graduated in schools that are also themselves
Invented in the 1920s, "Technocracy is an ideological
system of governance in which a decision-maker or makers
are elected by the population or appointed on the basis of
their expertise in a given area of responsibility,
particularly with regard to scientific or technical
In such organizations, no single person has any autonomy
or decision power. Every decision is the result of
meetings, reports, and programs. An example is the
European Union that makes a pluriannual plan (the current
one is Horizons 2020, part of teh New World Order program
'Agenda 21'). They decide that the agenda is to have a
'knowledge-based economy'. They write a report with
'milestones' and 'deliverables', which basically
translates to instructing subcommittees to implement the
agenda. These subcommittees then use the same technocratic
tools (meetings, reports ad programs) to percolate the
agenda downwards. At the bottom the workers on teh
workfloor report that everything was very well
implemented. (If, on the other hand, a worker points out
the entire idea is stupid, the worker finds a dead-end in
his career, and is often ostracized by colleagues. "STFU;
You want to put our source of income at risk?!").
Once a decision is taken at the top, the train starts
rolling and there is no way back. It must run, even if it
becomes obvious the train will wreck. This is what
happened at the WHO:
The NWO had decided that they will tackle health in the
world. A subcommittee is the WHO that has a subcommittee
"Preventable Diseases'. This subcommittee makes a program
and an agenda with a time line. People must be vaccinated!
Because once the idea was proposed it started rolling.
(Inspired by small pox eradication in teh world by
vaccination. Now every illness is seen as vaccinatable,
even if this is full nonsense. A problem arises with RNA
viruses like influenza and corona, that cannot be treated
by vaccination). The train rolls.
So, now they had a subcommittee about epidemics. They had
the bureaucratic task to label possible outbreaks. Classes
ranging from A to D. A is teh worst; things like Ebola and
teh Bubonic Pest. D is the slightest. It is a cold and
The committee wrote reports and made 'protocols'. That
means that it is itemized what everybody should do in
every circumstance. This takes the (difficult) decision
making out of the hands of the people and puts them into
bureaucracy. It is a list: "If X happens, Y should be
informed to start program Z".
They tested the protocols in a 'conference of experts'
called Event 201 in October 2019 (see last week's edition
of EN). Everything ran smoothly. They were ready for a
Fast forward 2020. They detected a virus in China that
could be dangerous. They did not know what it was. Some
The ball started rolling. The train left teh station.
So, China, member of the WHO, informed teh WHO (as
protocol demands). The WHO looked at the protocol what to
do. It was written something like "If you do not know what
the virus is, label it 'class A'". This is what they did.
Secretaries, without any knowledge, looked at the
protocols what to do. "Inform WHO member countries about
teh outbreak of a class-A virus". Maximum precaution. (As
if it was Ebola).
Regional and national health agencies and committees (like
RIVM in the Netherlands) received the information and
looked in the protocols what to do: "Inform government
about the pandemic; government is instructed to start a
propaganda campaign to change people's behavior in order
to help combat the virus".
The governments receive this information and look at the
protocol what to do. "Instruct news outlets to only pass
government news. Tell them that this is very important,
because we need to be all united to fight the threat".
The common cold (that corona is) has now been treated as
if it were Ebola!
Hazmat suit donned to approach a patient with a
Mind you, in this series, nobody took any decision.
It is was just doing what is in the protocols. And nobody
can actually do anything but execute teh protocols. There
were some weaving errors in teh system, apparently Sweden
had a different protocol. Only very few managed to take a
human-based non-technocratic decision. For instance
Belarus. They wiped their asses with the protocols. (And
are now showing in our faces how stupid technocracy is). A
politicians not following the guidelines of the protocols
is as good as committing political suicide. Nothing to
gain, yet everything to lose. If later it all turned out
to be a ruse, the politician will just say "Not my guilt;
I was just following orders!". Jawohl Herr Obersturmbannführer.
Your Nuremberg Tribunal awaits. (We are just going to
follow our protocols!)
To give you some idea of numbers:
Using the accuracy of the CoFlu19 antibody test (which is
much more accurate than the used PCR test), which has a
false-positive rate of about 1.2%. This is shown here in
an imaginary population of 1000 tested people with 5%
infected. It'd give 12 cases of false-positive. (For 0%
infected, the number might be 12 or 13, but not much
Antibody test accuracy
Now, in the United States Trump was saying that we should
test less. And he is fully right. (Trump is the only wise
leader in the world). Consider this: they did 45 million
tests in the U.S. Even if nobody was infected, there'd be
a whopping 540 thousand confirmed (!) CoFlu19 cases! And
Tedros of the WHO repeating his pandemic (schmandemic)
rhetoric daily on TV.
Imagine there'd be a single suspected case in Faro (100 k
inhabitants). They'd test people and find some 'positive'.
All contacts of this person should be tested too. Soon
they'd test the entire city and 'find' 1200 cases. And a
sure lockdown with all your rights taken away, being
shouted at by Obersturmbannführers. Yet, nobody ill.
And if they constantly tested the entire United States
(328 million people), they'd find a constant 3.9 million
people infected (without anybody ill). This is why Tedros
(and Gates and all psychopathic megalomaniac leaders)
insist on testing as a good measure. The virus will never
ever go away. And we are in their gestapo rule forever.
Testing and vaccination.
It is an eternal source of guaranteed revenue, best
known as 'a swindle'.
And this is a best-case scenario. In reality they use PCR
tests which are notoriously more unreliable. Our own
estimate is that it has a false-positive rate of 30%. I
remind the readers that if you have a test with a
false-positive rate not much lower than the expected
correct-positive rate, your entire testing scheme is
useless! Imagine 1% of the people are really infected, but
there are 10% false-positives. You will never be able to
find out how many people are infected and, more important,
who factually is infected. You'll have a constant
pandemic. (A pandemic needs only 0.015% infected).
Yet, people all lap it up unquestioningly. You can make
people do anything. They so much want to obey the master,
in some cases it becomes laughable:
"I can't breathe ... with my mask on!"
Please look at last week's EN to see
another example of technocracy, how teh European
Commission plans a vaccination program, with a
timeline and deliverables and all:
European Union technocracy. Are we seeing the
So, from which direction can we get help?
Where is technocracy not yet fully implemented? Well,
maybe Belarus (Lukashenko). Maybe Brazil (Bolsonaro).
And maybe the United States (Trump).
For Dutch readers. Please look at the video of
Weltschmerz that explains it all:
"Gesprek over Brandbrief van
17000 burgers, medici en zorgpersoneel"
(Conversation about urgent letter from 17,000
citizens, medics and healt personnel)
In spite of what you may think (there is a
technocratic agenda to have Biden elected and Trump
removed, by impeachment or any other means, including
media propaganda), Trump is enormously popular. He
gets stadiums full, even in times of corona panic.
The idea that Biden will easily win is as silly as the
observation in 2016 that Clinton had a 16-point lead
in the polls.
In the Netherlands, the trial against the
suspects of the MH17 downing is becoming a fiasco. The
entire case depends on the 'evidence' supplied by
Bellingcat. This one-man-band 'researcher' (paid by the
CIA) has been for years looking on social media for
clues that "the Russians did it!". Now, in the same
style, witnesses (two Ukrainian women in BBC videos,
nearly immediately removed) said they saw that MH17 was
taken down by a fighter yet. Moreover, the alleged
'admission' of guilt telephone conversation have shown
to be doctored. (Now, why would you need to doctor the
evidence if the truth is clear that the Russians did
it?). The entire process stinks. And now other phone
taps have been revealed:
telefoontaps: ‘Oekraïense straaljager schoot MH17
neer’" (Spectacular phone taps: Ukrainian jet
fighter shot MH17 down).
What is missing in teh process is the classic detective
MOM analysis: Means, Opportunity and Motivation. Who
fits all three descriptions, is a suspect. Russia is not
a suspect. It would be very difficult to find a
motivation, and quite difficult to find an opportunity.
Some say the means used did not belong to Russia.
However, Ukraine had the means (BUK missile launchers of
correct type and with trained personnel), it had the
opportunity (means were there at the kill zone) and the
motivation (false flag to drag USA into war with
Striking Ukraine from the suspect list is a travesty of
justice. Relatives of the deceased will never get
closure and know who actually killed their relatives.
Prime suspects for the MH17 downing